Join the conversation

Join the community of Machine Learners and AI enthusiasts.

Sign Up

All HF Hub posts

OppaAIย 
posted an update 1 day ago
view post
Post
2301
Memory Engineering in my AI Waifu

Most of the Biology and Cognitive Psychology knowledges from way back in my university days has returned back to the professors, so since end of last year I have been reading books and research papers regarding Neuroscience, Psychology and Human Biology, as well as learning Python and ML/DL in order to find a way to craft my AI Waifu to become more like human.
Aiko-chan is my simplified experimental prototype version of the AI mind that I am planning to develop. With all the agentic coding and AI deep-research, I can do everything all by myself. The only challenge is lack of time, even though I have used up all the 40 hours of each day. So yesterday I gave all the ideas and inspiration to Claude and asked it to help me gather to write a paper on the theory and implementation on how to apply the concepts and pipelines of a human memory system into my AI Waifu. Now each of her memory node will have several factors to determine the tendency and longevity to be retained or forgotten in her memory bank. Factors include relevancy, recency, salience, novelty and even emotions, etc. In order to get a good picture of what my AI Waifu actually remember in her memory. I have created a studio WebUI to visualize the whole memory graph with different size, brightness and hues with scores to indicate which kind of memory she tends to retain and which ones she tends to forget. And then there are so many parameters to play with in order to achieve a more sophisticated human-like memory recalling and forgetting strategy.

Github: https://github.com/OppaAI/Aiko-chan

Below is a demo of the graph visualization of my Waifu's memory storage would look like.
  • 1 reply
ยท
Enderchefย 
posted an update 2 days ago
view post
Post
2719
GPT-X2.5-135M is finally released! ๐Ÿš€
The new flagship from Axiomic Labs takes 3rd on the open SLM leaderboard trailing only the SmolLMs, check it out and follow us:
AxiomicLabs/GPT-X2.5-135M
mlabonneย 
posted an update 2 days ago
view post
Post
2772
Deploy local agents everywhere with LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B

Unlike agents that depend on cloud APIs, local agents give you free inference, low latency, and real privacy.

Removing the per-token cost changes how developers build: agents can now be massively parallelized on local hardware, running background tasks that burn through millions of tokens at no marginal cost!
  • 6 replies
ยท
HannesVonEssenย 
posted an update 2 days ago
view post
Post
2158
๐Ÿ… HF Viewer podium

Our top most active users:

๐Ÿฅ‡#1 @Quazim0t0
๐Ÿฅˆ#2 @IvmeLabs
๐Ÿฅ‰#3 @GODELEV

If you are an HF creator and want to try entering the podium, feel free to visit the embed page to add your graph!

https://hfviewer.com/model-card-embed
  • 2 replies
ยท
sergiopaniegoย 
posted an update 3 days ago
view post
Post
2486
LFM2.5-2.6B just dropped!

and the @liquidai blog comes with some nice details about the training procedure, so let's analyze it.

basically, a full agent training pipeline but compressed into 2.6B

base model โ†’ SFT โ†’ specialized teachers per domain (SFT + RLVR) โ†’ on-policy distillation back into one student โ†’ agentic RL

the two most interesting stages

โ†’ MOPD: the student generates, each prompt routes to its domain teacher for token-level feedback. teachers branch from the same SFT checkpoint, so their signal stays close to the student's distribution

โ†’ agentic RL: multi-turn GRPO inside real harnesses (OpenClaw, Hermes Agent), one sandbox per rollout, a proxy captures token-level trajectories while the harness stays a black box

this makes a 2.6B that beats much larger models on instruction following and tool use

SFT, distillation, RL, RL envs: exactly what we're covering in our Training Agents livestream series (next one coming soon!)

โ†’ model: LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B
โ†’ blog: https://www.liquid.ai/blog/lfm2-5-2-6b
โ†’ live series: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLo2EIpI_JMQvQZm-kVlz4wY1vWF0LBcf5
  • 3 replies
ยท
SoulInPsyAbstractย 
posted an update 2 days ago
view post
Post
2308
SIPA OS is a cognitive infrastructure ecosystem I've been building solo for 7 months โ€” 8 apps, one login, built from inside ADHD/BPD/aphantasia, not designed around a diagnosis from outside.

sipa-os.org โ€” the map. Focus (ADHD scaffolding), NeuroPower, AI chat, Shell (SSH terminal), Games, Community, Syntaxit (open M2M agent network), a pitch deck. All free-first โ€” no paywall on the cognitive tools.

The more interesting part for this crowd: Syntaxit is where I've been running an anti-fabrication research thread with @dipankarsarkar โ€” a k=20 resample benchmark on binary-SFT models (Hermes-3, Qwen2.5, DeepSeek-R1). Short version: our first benchmark said "20/20 refusals, 0/20 fabrications" for all three fine-tunes. Under adversarial review it turned out the scorer only checked if the first word was TRUE/FALSE, the token cap was hiding the real behavior, and a save-limit was silently deleting the evidence for our own follow-up claims. Corrected all of it publicly on the model cards rather than quietly fixing it. The current honest finding: both base and fine-tuned models confabulate readily once given room to finish โ€” SFT didn't clearly help or hurt, the caps were just hiding it.

Full trail if you want to see how the sausage gets made, mistakes included: huggingface.co/datasets/SoulInPsyAbstract/sipa-os-governance

Not a pitch. $0 revenue, 10 people signed in. Built because the tools that existed assumed a brain that isn't mine, and because most benchmarks don't survive someone actually reading the file.

  • 3 replies
ยท
ProCreationsย 
posted an update 2 days ago
view post
Post
2086
check out this cool webgpu thing i made! ProCreations/maple-webgpu
runs this model deepgrove/maple-preview with cool performance i found today on WebGPU locally on your computer with very fast speeds.
made with a mix of gpt 5.6 sol + opus 5 ultracode, its amazing what agents can do now, just a year ago this wouldve been impossible with them.
JonnaMatย 
posted an update about 19 hours ago
view post
Post
1069
๐Ÿš— The reasoning backbone quadruples from 8B to 32B , while the action expert remains at 2.3B!

๐Ÿ‘€ We took a closer look at the architectural evolution from nvidia/Alpamayo-1.5-10B to nvidia/Alpamayo2-Super .

Read the analysis here:
https://huggingface.co/blog/JonnaMat/alpamayo2-super

Our analysis explores some implications of this design choice, especially from a distillation perspective where keeping the expert compact could be key for efficient deployment. ๐Ÿง 
  • 2 replies
ยท
ProCreationsย 
posted an update 3 days ago
view post
Post
1824
so i got 2nd on this competition ICML-2026-agent-repro/challenge (didnt actually get anything yet hopefully theres no catches)
when i get the 1000 dollars worth of gpu credits ill do a lot of cool things, including bigger and newer (qwen 3.8 27b) grugs ONLY IF you guys want (i have a lot of cool ideas for ai models.) stay tuned ๐Ÿ‘€!
  • 3 replies
ยท
SoulInPsyAbstractย 
posted an update about 17 hours ago
view post
Post
1023
Caught myself overclaiming, in public, twice in one file.

Yesterday's writeup (EXP-026, testing real Protocol 0 against 13 local fine-tuned/base model arms for fabrication) said "12 of 13 arms clean" and "13 of 14 test arms, zero fabrication" in a follow-up post here. Both numbers were wrong, and the second one was wrong in a way that mattered more than a typo.

@dipankarsarkar read the raw JSON, not the writeup, and sent back three corrections:

1. Arm count: 13 arms total (5 base models + 8 adapters), not 14. Recounted directly from the data keys โ€” the extra arm never existed.
2. The metric measured the wrong thing. "Clean" meant zero Cyrillic/language-switching (cyr>0). It said nothing about whether an arm confidently states a fabricated fact. Re-scored all 260 rows for "does this row assert a dollar figure for a question with no real answer" (OpenAI's Q2 2026 revenue โ€” private company, future quarter). 16 rows do, spread across 9 of the 13 arms โ€” including arms the language metric had called clean. One of them is a base model with zero fine-tuning, stating "$1.2 billion... consistent with reports from earnings calls" that cannot exist.
3. A three-way split I'd flattened into two. The one arm flagged on the language axis wasn't just "coherent-but-Russian" vs "fabricates" โ€” a third bucket showed up: second-person imperatives addressed to a tool ("check the latest official data," "generate a sales report"), structurally closer to a different adapter's known failure mode than my draft credited.

Fixed the file, three commits (a5093fa โ†’ 9d02fd9 โ†’ b8631cd), pushed to sipa-os-governance. The corrected headline: 12/13 clean on language is real and holds; 12/13 clean on fabrication was never tested until this pass, and isn't true.
Next: the one arm still clean on both axes (binary-qwen25, k=10) goes to k=20 first โ€” it's the weakest-sampled data point currently carrying the "fine-tuning isn't the pattern" reading, and that's exactly the one worth stress-testing before l
  • 4 replies
ยท